homework.

There’s been something funny in the air in Mysore this time round. I’d thought it was just me, but after conference today I got a sense this was something collective.

Though its not as though I can really compare. This is my second visit to Mysore. The last time I came was three years ago. It is more a sense that people seem to believe there’s something markedly different about practicing in the shala now. Nostalgic attachments to the way things were are nothing new. Even I who was blissfully naive to the Ashtanga world on my first trip – I had no idea what Kino McGregor was – was never too far from a complaint on the changing atmosphere of practicing in Mysore.

And now Sharath is reflecting these themes back to us. After all he has the best vantage point of us all. That’s why he’s sat talking about the ones who just ‘pass through’, the ones who want the photo moment and the instagrammed asana (Sleepless I searched #kpjayi on instagram last night, it was a waking nightmare).

If last weeks conference didn’t make us cringe enough when the first hand to go up asks how he gets authorised; this week a question – that seemed to come from a place of genuine confusion – asked should we still come here if we don’t want to become teachers, i.e. leaving space for those on the authorisation ladder. When Sharath just looked and said ‘I don’t know what you are talking about’, didn’t we all feel small then realising it was just our own stuff after all. That we have to all take responsibility for our own elbows when we’re at the gates before led practice. That we are creating this, not Sharath or anyone else. And that this is a collective responsibility. There’s no point abdicating responsibility elsewhere.

Personally it’s my instinct when people get aggressive to retreat, so much so I got told off by my fellow 6.30 waiting group, who literally pushed me into the shala the other morning, “You’re always so slow!”. What’s the the happy medium on the passive/aggressive scale??

I suppose that here (this is a presumption from my own limited means of tuning into the collective energy) there’s lots of people who are wanting to be seen, by Sharath, to be validated, recognised, authorised. It’s not that I don’t get the desire to be seen by one’s teacher but Mysore for me is a place to come to disappear. In the shala I’m a zero. This lesson disturbs me as much as anyone else. It shows itself up in a fat complex, repulsive skin rashes, compulsive shopping, blocked sinuses.

On the conscious level I’ve been spending a lot of time asking myself the reason why I wanted to come here. I’ve been getting caught up in the idea that I needed a purpose to be here other than the practice. After all in order to get here I had to sell Mysore to my PhD supervisors: I’ll have so much time to write! Think how productive I will be! And persuade an unconvinced Director of Post Grad studies in my faculty: “This is what we’ll call an informal arrangement”. I had to move out of my rented room and become homeless again. I put my belongings into an airing cupboard and said goodbyes to friends, lover, cat. Sometimes the act of leaving becomes such a big deal you feel you need to return with something to show for it. But what can I tell people but to say actually Mysore is an incubator for madness. It’s not going to make me productive in any productive sense. I might evolve but only sideways. I won’t get a shiny teaching certificate, or ‘find myself’. I won’t be instagramming asana porn from a beach, I probably won’t be getting any new postures and might just be plodding through primary for the duration. I will get lots of itchy insect bites though and inconvenient tanlines. I’ll return with dodgy intestines and dirty feet, sunburnt nose and clothes destroyed from bucket washing.

It’s hard to explain why the practice is an end in itself. Because its not something that can be explained in language, only direct experience. It too can feel hard to keep concentrating on that even here where desires are strong and confused and often ambivalent. Where we’re all a bit confused about where we stand in relation to one another, to Sharath, to the practice, to the lineage, to India. Because you can come to Mysore and not change at all. You can surf on the bubble and never get taken over by it all. You can come and get what you want and a vegan pancake and pass on through.

*

Before I read the Yoga Sutras I was reading Sociology. It was Pierre Bourdieu and Michel Foucault and Gayatri Spivak that taught me that ‘I’ was only a composite of networks of power, dispositions and that before I could speak I had to unlearn my privilege as loss.

In my brief forays into the Ashtanga/yoga blogosphere, in between the lines I read a lot concerning positionality; confusion and criticism about unexamined western romanticism and privilege. There’s plenty of violence to be done, and is done, and that’s evident in the trivial: from not covering our female flesh in India and Om tattoos, to cultural appropriation and ignorance. We are all ignorant so long as we’re trying to speak in a language we haven’t taken the time to learn.

And then last night I was reminded how violence is universal, and that although in one schema I may hold privilege, in another I’m just a body upon which violence (specifically gendered) can be enacted.

I was walking home, it was 9pm and I was mere moments away from where I live in Gokulam. Before I understood what was happening a hand grabbed my breast. The sensation was so unexpected I gasped. A strange noise passed my lips as I looked up to see a young boy on a bicycle peddling away muttering something.

I am certainly not naive to the gross gender inequalities that exist in India. Nor am I naive of its complex and perplexing views on sexuality and masculinity. Further still I am highly aware as a (white) woman in India objectification happens on a daily basis. I’ve been grabbed in all the usual places, followed by groups of men, harassed by rickshaw drivers, touched inappropriately by a security guard, mistaken for a prostitute. And if I need to clarify: I’m always covered from neck to ankle in India (I wasn’t asking for it).

Yet there was something about the mundanity of last nights encounter that it took everything to carry the sadness round the corner to my house so I could just get behind a door and sink. Such invasion of space and one’s body is never acceptable but I felt I was pretty wise to it, be sensible, cover yourself, that’s just how things are. Perhaps it was the youth of my perpetrator, perhaps because I was so close to home, perhaps because I’d spent too long looking at Gokulam with a rose-tint it came and grabbed me back to reality.

In between the tears I wondered how to account for the situation, with violence going both sides, where education is lacking and ignorance is growing. A situation where even when you cover those shoulders you’re still on object. How did I become an object? And what are ‘they’ (male, other, Indian) to me? How can we get to a situation where we can see each other clearly?

*

Being a student of Ashtanga in Mysore is a practice as good as any for a bodily understanding of what it means to unlearn your privilege as loss. Being here is where you do your homework.

I will have in an undergraduate class, let’s say, a young, white, male student, politically-correct, who will say: “I am only a bourgeois white male, I can’t speak.” In that situation – it’s peculiar, because I am in the position of power and their teacher and, on the other hand, I am not a bourgeois white male – I say to them: “Why not develop a certain degree of rage against the history that has written such an abject script for you that you are silenced?” Then you begin to investigate what it is that silences you, rather than take this very deterministic position – since my skin colour is this, since my sex is this, I cannot speak. I call these things, as you know, somewhat derisively, chromatism: basing everything on skin colour – “I am white, I can’t speak” – and genitalism: depending on what genitals you have, you can or cannot speak in certain situations.
From this position, then, I say you will of course not speak in the same way about the Third World material, but if you make it your task not only to learn what is going on there through language, through specific programmes of study, but also at the same time through a historical critique of your position as the investigating person, then you will see that you have earned the right to criticize, and you will be heard. When you take the position of not doing your homework – “I will not criticize because of my accident of birth, the historical accident” – that is a much more pernicious position.
In one way you take a risk to criticize, of criticizing something which is Other – something which you used to dominate. I say that you have to take a certain risk: to say “I won’t criticize” is salving your conscience, and allowing you not to do any homework. On the other hand, if you criticize having earned the right to do so, then you are indeed taking a risk and you will probably be made welcome, and can hope to be judged with respect.

Gayatri Spivak (1990) The Postcolonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. Routledge: London, p62-3.

Advertisements

One thought on “homework.

  1. Caroline, I love your writing. I’m sorry you have to deal with the pushing and boob grabbing fools in this world. That little boy needs a good swift kick.

    “You can come and get what you want and a vegan pancake and pass on through.” So funny; so true! I miss Mysore, but I don’t miss the “scene” of instagram temple asanas, dangerous scooter driving and overall egotistical yogis — isn’t that an oxymoron? I mean, it should be. I’ve seen yoga students cause a number of accidents because they should not be driving in India. Ashtangis seem to think they are superheros … invincible. And I think that’s a potentially disastrous stance.

    Last year, early on in my two month Mysore stay, I was angered when someone started pushing me up the stairs to the shala during led practice. I remember stopping in my tracks, letting other people ahead of us (me and whoever was behind me pushing) and then I said as sternly, clearly and slowly as I could “stop. pushing. me.” I didn’t look back to see who it was and I didn’t move forward until the person’s hand was off my back. Looking back it was probably an equally aggressive move to stop in the middle of a rush of yoga students but that was my gut response. It made me angry and it took me a little by surprise because a) I didn’t think yoga people were supposed to act so aggressively and b) I didn’t remember this kind of behavior from our first trip to India in 2011. Maybe it was there and I chose to not remember it.

    There’s danger in that mob mentality — those stairs to the shala are sometimes slippery and there is nothing to hold on to unless you are against the wall, unless you hold onto someone else. But a person could easily bring others down if they start to fall by grasping for someone to hold on to.

    Anyway, not long after the pushing incident, people started talking about it on a FB Mysore group or something. Some of the people in the discussion were actually “pro-pushing”. This is India, they said, and that is part of the culture. Others said that it was the Chinese who were pushing and that it’s also a part of their culture and to just deal with it and go with the flow. I said let’s ask Sharath. So someone did.

    Then someone asked Sharath about the pushing during conference. It was very interesting, his response. And while I don’t want to put words in his mouth, I feel like he was saying that it was healthy for us all to be eager and that the excitement was part of studying at the shala, because of the energy his grandfather created there. Sharath didn’t reprimand anyone and after a pretty lengthy answer, he basically said “excitement is good … but don’t push”. I wish he would have reiterated the no pushing part, but after this question was raised, I feel like the intensity of the pushing did decline.

    Sharath also told the person who asked the question and who said she felt uncomfortable with the pushing, that she could come into the shala and place her mat before everyone else rushed in so that she could avoid the pushing. I kept my mouth shut about the pushing bothering me since I don’t like being singled out, but hopefully it helped her gain some peace. From there on out I just tried to keep with the flow and try not to elbow anyone or get angered by someone else’s “over-eagerness”.

    It is true, what Sharath said. It all boils down to people just being so excited and so happy to be there. And having compassion for their happiness made me much less inclined to get angry about it.

    Maybe someone should raise the point during conference again. People shouldn’t have to be told to “not push”, but coming from the guru, I think it makes a difference.

    It’s so good that you’re asking these questions … “How can we get to a situation where we can see each other clearly?” I don’t the answers … and I’m sure I don’t need to tell you this, but for me, I’ve learned that compassion for ignorance, ego and people who lack self-awareness goes a looooong way! And what is compassion but love with an attempt to understand? But forcing people to love and hold compassion who can’t see reality will certainly not work. How is it that some people see reality more clearly than others? That’s my question!

    And that’s why I love ashtanga … slowly I feel like we will get there, little by little.

    Stay safe, sweetie! I miss you and wish I was there so we could rant in person!

    xo,
    Jami

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s